Removed the Kripke model
This commit is contained in:
parent
fbf699b63e
commit
2534ebf85e
@ -239,7 +239,7 @@ module FFOLCompleteness where
|
||||
app : {Γ : Con} → {F G : For Γ} → Γ ⊢ (F ⇒ G) → Γ ⊢ F → Γ ⊢ G
|
||||
app prf prf' = λ w γ → prf w γ w id-a (prf' w γ)
|
||||
-- Again, we don't write the _[_]p equalities as everything is in Prop
|
||||
|
||||
vv
|
||||
-- ∀i and ∀e
|
||||
∀i : {Γ : Con} → {F : For (Γ ▹ₜ)} → (Γ ▹ₜ) ⊢ F → Γ ⊢ (∀∀ F)
|
||||
∀i p w γ = λ t → p w (γ ,× t)
|
||||
|
||||
@ -317,214 +317,3 @@ module FinitaryFirstOrderLogic where
|
||||
-- (((∀ x . A (x)) ⇒ B)⇒ B) ⇒ ∀ x . ((A (x) ⇒ B) ⇒ B)
|
||||
ex5 : {A : For (⊤ₛ ▹ₜ)} → {B : For ⊤ₛ} → ⊤ₛ ⊢ ((((∀∀ A) ⇒ B) ⇒ B) ⇒ (∀∀ ((A ⇒ (B [ πₜ¹ id ]f)) ⇒ (B [ πₜ¹ id ]f))))
|
||||
ex5 ◇◇ h t h' = h (λ h'' → h' (h'' t))
|
||||
|
||||
record Kripke : Set (lsuc (ℓ¹)) where
|
||||
field
|
||||
World : Set ℓ¹
|
||||
_≤_ : World → World → Prop
|
||||
≤refl : {w : World} → w ≤ w
|
||||
≤tran : {w w' w'' : World} → w ≤ w' → w' ≤ w'' → w ≤ w'
|
||||
TM : World → Set ℓ¹
|
||||
TM≤ : {w w' : World} → w ≤ w' → TM w → TM w'
|
||||
REL : (w : World) → TM w → TM w → Prop ℓ¹
|
||||
REL≤ : {w w' : World} → {t u : TM w} → (eq : w ≤ w') → REL w t u → REL w' (TM≤ eq t) (TM≤ eq u)
|
||||
infixr 10 _∘_
|
||||
Con = World → Set ℓ¹
|
||||
Sub : Con → Con → Set ℓ¹
|
||||
Sub Δ Γ = (w : World) → Δ w → Γ w
|
||||
_∘_ : {Γ Δ Ξ : Con} → Sub Δ Ξ → Sub Γ Δ → Sub Γ Ξ
|
||||
α ∘ β = λ w γ → α w (β w γ)
|
||||
id : {Γ : Con} → Sub Γ Γ
|
||||
id = λ w γ → γ
|
||||
◇ : Con -- The initial object of the category
|
||||
◇ = λ w → ⊤ₛ
|
||||
ε : {Γ : Con} → Sub Γ ◇ -- The morphism from the initial to any object
|
||||
ε w Γ = ttₛ
|
||||
|
||||
-- Functor Con → Set called Tm
|
||||
Tm : Con → Set ℓ¹
|
||||
Tm Γ = (w : World) → (Γ w) → TM w
|
||||
_[_]t : {Γ Δ : Con} → Tm Γ → Sub Δ Γ → Tm Δ -- The functor's action on morphisms
|
||||
t [ σ ]t = λ w → λ γ → t w (σ w γ)
|
||||
[]t-id : {Γ : Con} → {x : Tm Γ} → x [ id {Γ} ]t ≡ x
|
||||
[]t-id = refl
|
||||
[]t-∘ : {Γ Δ Ξ : Con} → {α : Sub Ξ Δ} → {β : Sub Δ Γ} → {t : Tm Γ} → t [ β ∘ α ]t ≡ (t [ β ]t) [ α ]t
|
||||
[]t-∘ = refl
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
-- We simply define « bulk _[σ]t » (that acts on *n* terms from *Tm Γ*)
|
||||
_[_]tz : {Γ Δ : Con} → {n : Nat} → Array (Tm Γ) n → Sub Δ Γ → Array (Tm Δ) n
|
||||
tz [ σ ]tz = map (λ s → s [ σ ]t) tz
|
||||
[]tz-∘ : {Γ Δ Ξ : Con} → {α : Sub Ξ Δ} → {β : Sub Δ Γ} → {n : Nat} → {tz : Array (Tm Γ) n} → tz [ β ∘ α ]tz ≡ tz [ β ]tz [ α ]tz
|
||||
[]tz-∘ {tz = zero} = refl
|
||||
[]tz-∘ {α = α} {β = β} {tz = next x tz} = substP (λ tz' → (next ((x [ β ]t) [ α ]t) tz') ≡ (((next x tz) [ β ]tz) [ α ]tz)) (≡sym ([]tz-∘ {α = α} {β = β} {tz = tz})) refl
|
||||
[]tz-id : {Γ : Con} → {n : Nat} → {tz : Array (Tm Γ) n} → tz [ id ]tz ≡ tz
|
||||
[]tz-id {tz = zero} = refl
|
||||
[]tz-id {tz = next x tz} = substP (λ tz' → next x tz' ≡ next x tz) (≡sym ([]tz-id {tz = tz})) refl
|
||||
|
||||
-- Tm⁺
|
||||
_▹ₜ : Con → Con
|
||||
Γ ▹ₜ = λ w → (Γ w) × (TM w)
|
||||
πₜ¹ : {Γ Δ : Con} → Sub Δ (Γ ▹ₜ) → Sub Δ Γ
|
||||
πₜ¹ σ = λ w → λ x → proj×₁ (σ w x)
|
||||
πₜ² : {Γ Δ : Con} → Sub Δ (Γ ▹ₜ) → Tm Δ
|
||||
πₜ² σ = λ w → λ x → proj×₂ (σ w x)
|
||||
_,ₜ_ : {Γ Δ : Con} → Sub Δ Γ → Tm Δ → Sub Δ (Γ ▹ₜ)
|
||||
σ ,ₜ t = λ w → λ x → (σ w x) ,× (t w x)
|
||||
πₜ²∘,ₜ : {Γ Δ : Con} → {σ : Sub Δ Γ} → {t : Tm Δ} → πₜ² (σ ,ₜ t) ≡ t
|
||||
πₜ²∘,ₜ {σ = σ} {t} = refl {a = t}
|
||||
πₜ¹∘,ₜ : {Γ Δ : Con} → {σ : Sub Δ Γ} → {t : Tm Δ} → πₜ¹ (σ ,ₜ t) ≡ σ
|
||||
πₜ¹∘,ₜ = refl
|
||||
,ₜ∘πₜ : {Γ Δ : Con} → {σ : Sub Δ (Γ ▹ₜ)} → (πₜ¹ σ) ,ₜ (πₜ² σ) ≡ σ
|
||||
,ₜ∘πₜ = refl
|
||||
,ₜ∘ : {Γ Δ Ξ : Con}{σ : Sub Γ Ξ}{δ : Sub Δ Γ}{t : Tm Γ} → (σ ,ₜ t) ∘ δ ≡ (σ ∘ δ) ,ₜ (t [ δ ]t)
|
||||
,ₜ∘ = refl
|
||||
|
||||
-- Functor Con → Set called For
|
||||
For : Con → Set (lsuc ℓ¹)
|
||||
For Γ = (w : World) → (Γ w) → Prop ℓ¹
|
||||
_[_]f : {Γ Δ : Con} → For Γ → Sub Δ Γ → For Δ -- The functor's action on morphisms
|
||||
F [ σ ]f = λ w → λ x → F w (σ w x)
|
||||
[]f-id : {Γ : Con} → {F : For Γ} → F [ id {Γ} ]f ≡ F
|
||||
[]f-id = refl
|
||||
[]f-∘ : {Γ Δ Ξ : Con} → {α : Sub Ξ Δ} → {β : Sub Δ Γ} → {F : For Γ} → F [ β ∘ α ]f ≡ (F [ β ]f) [ α ]f
|
||||
[]f-∘ = refl
|
||||
|
||||
-- Formulas with relation on terms
|
||||
R : {Γ : Con} → Tm Γ → Tm Γ → For Γ
|
||||
R t u = λ w → λ γ → REL w (t w γ) (u w γ)
|
||||
R[] : {Γ Δ : Con} → {σ : Sub Δ Γ} → {t u : Tm Γ} → (R t u) [ σ ]f ≡ R (t [ σ ]t) (u [ σ ]t)
|
||||
R[] {σ = σ} = cong₂ R refl refl
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
-- Proofs
|
||||
_⊢_ : (Γ : Con) → For Γ → Prop ℓ¹
|
||||
Γ ⊢ F = ∀ w (γ : Γ w) → F w γ
|
||||
_[_]p : {Γ Δ : Con} → {F : For Γ} → Γ ⊢ F → (σ : Sub Δ Γ) → Δ ⊢ (F [ σ ]f) -- The functor's action on morphisms
|
||||
prf [ σ ]p = λ w → λ γ → prf w (σ w γ)
|
||||
-- Equalities below are useless because Γ ⊢ F is in prop
|
||||
-- []p-id : {Γ : Con} → {F : For Γ} → {prf : Γ ⊢ F} → prf [ id {Γ} ]p ≡ prf
|
||||
-- []p-∘ : {Γ Δ Ξ : Con} → {α : Sub Ξ Δ} → {β : Sub Δ Γ} → {F : For Γ} → {prf : Γ ⊢ F} → prf [ α ∘ β ]p ≡ (prf [ β ]p) [ α ]p
|
||||
|
||||
-- → Prop⁺
|
||||
_▹ₚ_ : (Γ : Con) → For Γ → Con
|
||||
Γ ▹ₚ F = λ w → (Γ w) ×'' (F w)
|
||||
πₚ¹ : {Γ Δ : Con} → {F : For Γ} → Sub Δ (Γ ▹ₚ F) → Sub Δ Γ
|
||||
πₚ¹ σ w δ = proj×''₁ (σ w δ)
|
||||
πₚ² : {Γ Δ : Con} → {F : For Γ} → (σ : Sub Δ (Γ ▹ₚ F)) → Δ ⊢ (F [ πₚ¹ σ ]f)
|
||||
πₚ² σ w δ = proj×''₂ (σ w δ)
|
||||
_,ₚ_ : {Γ Δ : Con} → {F : For Γ} → (σ : Sub Δ Γ) → Δ ⊢ (F [ σ ]f) → Sub Δ (Γ ▹ₚ F)
|
||||
_,ₚ_ {F = F} σ pf w δ = (σ w δ) ,×'' pf w δ
|
||||
,ₚ∘πₚ : {Γ Δ : Con} → {F : For Γ} → {σ : Sub Δ (Γ ▹ₚ F)} → (πₚ¹ σ) ,ₚ (πₚ² σ) ≡ σ
|
||||
,ₚ∘πₚ = refl
|
||||
πₚ¹∘,ₚ : {Γ Δ : Con} → {σ : Sub Δ Γ} → {F : For Γ} → {prf : Δ ⊢ (F [ σ ]f)} → πₚ¹ {Γ} {Δ} {F} (σ ,ₚ prf) ≡ σ
|
||||
πₚ¹∘,ₚ = refl
|
||||
,ₚ∘ : {Γ Δ Ξ : Con}{σ : Sub Γ Ξ}{δ : Sub Δ Γ}{F : For Ξ}{prf : Γ ⊢ (F [ σ ]f)} →
|
||||
(_,ₚ_ {F = F} σ prf) ∘ δ ≡ (σ ∘ δ) ,ₚ (substP (λ F → Δ ⊢ F) (≡sym ([]f-∘ {α = δ} {β = σ} {F = F})) (prf [ δ ]p))
|
||||
,ₚ∘ {Γ} {Δ} {Ξ} {σ} {δ} {F} {prf} = refl
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
-- Implication
|
||||
_⇒_ : {Γ : Con} → For Γ → For Γ → For Γ
|
||||
F ⇒ G = λ w → λ γ → (∀ w' → w ≤ w' → (F w γ) → (G w γ))
|
||||
[]f-⇒ : {Γ Δ : Con} → {F G : For Γ} → {σ : Sub Δ Γ} → (F ⇒ G) [ σ ]f ≡ (F [ σ ]f) ⇒ (G [ σ ]f)
|
||||
[]f-⇒ = refl
|
||||
|
||||
-- Forall
|
||||
∀∀ : {Γ : Con} → For (Γ ▹ₜ) → For Γ
|
||||
∀∀ F = λ w → λ γ → ∀ t → F w (γ ,× t)
|
||||
[]f-∀∀ : {Γ Δ : Con} → {F : For (Γ ▹ₜ)} → {σ : Sub Δ Γ} → (∀∀ F) [ σ ]f ≡ (∀∀ (F [ (σ ∘ πₜ¹ id) ,ₜ πₜ² id ]f))
|
||||
[]f-∀∀ = refl
|
||||
|
||||
-- Lam & App
|
||||
lam : {Γ : Con} → {F : For Γ} → {G : For Γ} → (Γ ▹ₚ F) ⊢ (G [ πₚ¹ id ]f) → Γ ⊢ (F ⇒ G)
|
||||
lam prf = λ w γ w' s h → prf w (γ ,×'' h)
|
||||
app : {Γ : Con} → {F G : For Γ} → Γ ⊢ (F ⇒ G) → Γ ⊢ F → Γ ⊢ G
|
||||
app prf prf' = λ w γ → prf w γ w ≤refl (prf' w γ)
|
||||
-- Again, we don't write the _[_]p equalities as everything is in Prop
|
||||
|
||||
-- ∀i and ∀e
|
||||
∀i : {Γ : Con} → {F : For (Γ ▹ₜ)} → (Γ ▹ₜ) ⊢ F → Γ ⊢ (∀∀ F)
|
||||
∀i p w γ = λ t → p w (γ ,× t)
|
||||
∀e : {Γ : Con} → {F : For (Γ ▹ₜ)} → Γ ⊢ (∀∀ F) → {t : Tm Γ} → Γ ⊢ ( F [(id {Γ}) ,ₜ t ]f)
|
||||
∀e p {t} w γ = p w γ (t w γ)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
tod : FFOL
|
||||
tod = record
|
||||
{ Con = Con
|
||||
; Sub = Sub
|
||||
; _∘_ = _∘_
|
||||
; ∘-ass = refl
|
||||
; id = id
|
||||
; idl = refl
|
||||
; idr = refl
|
||||
; ◇ = ◇
|
||||
; ε = ε
|
||||
; ε-u = refl
|
||||
; Tm = Tm
|
||||
; _[_]t = _[_]t
|
||||
; []t-id = []t-id
|
||||
; []t-∘ = λ {Γ} {Δ} {Ξ} {α} {β} {t} → []t-∘ {Γ} {Δ} {Ξ} {α} {β} {t}
|
||||
; _▹ₜ = _▹ₜ
|
||||
; πₜ¹ = πₜ¹
|
||||
; πₜ² = πₜ²
|
||||
; _,ₜ_ = _,ₜ_
|
||||
; πₜ²∘,ₜ = λ {Γ} {Δ} {σ} → πₜ²∘,ₜ {Γ} {Δ} {σ}
|
||||
; πₜ¹∘,ₜ = λ {Γ} {Δ} {σ} {t} → πₜ¹∘,ₜ {Γ} {Δ} {σ} {t}
|
||||
; ,ₜ∘πₜ = ,ₜ∘πₜ
|
||||
; ,ₜ∘ = λ {Γ} {Δ} {Ξ} {σ} {δ} {t} → ,ₜ∘ {Γ} {Δ} {Ξ} {σ} {δ} {t}
|
||||
; For = For
|
||||
; _[_]f = _[_]f
|
||||
; []f-id = []f-id
|
||||
; []f-∘ = λ {Γ} {Δ} {Ξ} {α} {β} {F} → []f-∘ {Γ} {Δ} {Ξ} {α} {β} {F}
|
||||
; _⊢_ = _⊢_
|
||||
; _[_]p = _[_]p
|
||||
; _▹ₚ_ = _▹ₚ_
|
||||
; πₚ¹ = πₚ¹
|
||||
; πₚ² = πₚ²
|
||||
; _,ₚ_ = _,ₚ_
|
||||
; ,ₚ∘πₚ = ,ₚ∘πₚ
|
||||
; πₚ¹∘,ₚ = λ {Γ} {Δ} {F} {σ} {p} → πₚ¹∘,ₚ {Γ} {Δ} {F} {σ} {p}
|
||||
; ,ₚ∘ = λ {Γ} {Δ} {Ξ} {σ} {δ} {F} {prf} → ,ₚ∘ {Γ} {Δ} {Ξ} {σ} {δ} {F} {prf}
|
||||
; _⇒_ = _⇒_
|
||||
; []f-⇒ = λ {Γ} {F} {G} {σ} → []f-⇒ {Γ} {F} {G} {σ}
|
||||
; ∀∀ = ∀∀
|
||||
; []f-∀∀ = λ {Γ} {Δ} {F} {σ} → []f-∀∀ {Γ} {Δ} {F} {σ}
|
||||
; lam = lam
|
||||
; app = app
|
||||
; ∀i = ∀i
|
||||
; ∀e = ∀e
|
||||
; R = R
|
||||
; R[] = λ {Γ} {Δ} {σ} {t} {u} → R[] {Γ} {Δ} {σ} {t} {u}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
{-
|
||||
-- Completeness proof
|
||||
|
||||
-- We first build our universal Kripke model
|
||||
|
||||
module ComplenessProof (M : FFOL {ℓ¹} {ℓ²} {ℓ³} {ℓ⁴} {ℓ⁵}) where
|
||||
|
||||
-- We have a model, we construct the Universal Kripke model of this model
|
||||
|
||||
World : Set ℓ¹
|
||||
World = FFOL.Con M
|
||||
|
||||
_≤_ : World → World → Prop
|
||||
Γ ≤ Δ = {!FFOL.Sub M Δ Γ!}
|
||||
|
||||
UK : Kripke
|
||||
UK = record
|
||||
{ World = World
|
||||
; _≤_ = λ Δ Γ → {!FFOL.Sub M Δ Γ!}
|
||||
; ≤refl = {!FFOL.id M!}
|
||||
; ≤tran = {!FFOL.∘ M!}
|
||||
; TM = {!!}
|
||||
; TM≤ = {!!}
|
||||
; REL = {!!}
|
||||
; REL≤ = {!!}
|
||||
}
|
||||
-}
|
||||
|
||||
@ -162,10 +162,12 @@ module PropUtil where
|
||||
{eq : α ≡ β} {f : {ξ : A} → R ξ → P ξ} {x : R α}
|
||||
→ coe (cong P eq) (f {α} x) ≡ f (coe (cong R eq) x)
|
||||
substfpoly {eq = refl} {f} = ≡tran coerefl (cong f (≡sym coerefl))
|
||||
|
||||
substppoly : {ℓ ℓ' ℓ'' ℓ''' : Level}{A : Set ℓ}{P : A → Set ℓ'}{R : A → Set ℓ''}{Q : A → Set ℓ'''}{α β : A}
|
||||
{eq : α ≡ β}{f : {ξ : A} → R ξ → Q ξ → P ξ} {x : R α} {y : Q α}
|
||||
→ coe (cong P eq) (f {α} x y) ≡ f {β} (coe (cong R eq) x) (coe (cong Q eq) y)
|
||||
substppoly {eq = refl} {f}{x}{y} = ≡tran coerefl (cong₂ f (≡sym coerefl) (≡sym coerefl))
|
||||
|
||||
substfpoly' : {ℓ ℓ' ℓ'' : Level}{A B : Set ℓ}{P R : A → Set ℓ'}{Q : B → Prop ℓ''}{α β : A}{γ δ : B}
|
||||
{eq : α ≡ β}{eq' : γ ≡ δ} {f : {ξ : A}{ι : B} → R ξ → Q ι → P ξ} {x : R α} {y : Q γ}
|
||||
→ coe (cong P eq) (f {α} {γ} x y) ≡ f {β} {δ} (coe (cong R eq) x) (substP Q eq' y)
|
||||
|
||||
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user