Don't comment code out when you are using git
This commit is contained in:
parent
bcff4c47e6
commit
2aca2ed0ce
GPG Key ID:
7054D5D6A90F084F
@ -427,308 +427,3 @@ module FinitaryFirstOrderLogic (F : Nat → Set) (R : Nat → Set) where
|
||||
; rel = rel
|
||||
; rel[] = rel[]
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
{-
|
||||
module M where
|
||||
|
||||
data Con : Set
|
||||
data For : Con → Set
|
||||
data _⊢_ : (Γ : Con) → For Γ → Prop
|
||||
|
||||
data Con where
|
||||
◇ : Con
|
||||
_▹ₜ : Con → Con
|
||||
_▹ₚ_ : (Γ : Con) → (A : For Γ) → Con
|
||||
data Sub : Con → Con → Set where
|
||||
id : {Γ : Con} → Sub Γ Γ
|
||||
next▹ₜ : {Γ Δ : Con} → Sub Δ Γ → Sub Δ (Γ ▹ₜ)
|
||||
next▹ₚ : {Γ Δ : Con} → {A : For Γ} → Sub Δ Γ → Sub Δ (Γ ▹ₚ A)
|
||||
_∘_ : {Γ Δ Ξ : Con} → Sub Δ Ξ → Sub Γ Δ → Sub Γ Ξ
|
||||
ε : {Γ : Con} → Sub ◇ Γ
|
||||
ε {◇} = id
|
||||
ε {Γ ▹ₜ} = next▹ₜ ε
|
||||
ε {Γ ▹ₚ A} = next▹ₚ ε
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
data For where
|
||||
_⇒_ : {Γ : Con} → For Γ → For Γ → For Γ
|
||||
∀∀ : {Γ : Con} → For (Γ ▹ₜ) → For Γ
|
||||
infixr 10 _∘_
|
||||
|
||||
-- Functor Con → Set called Tm
|
||||
data Tm : Con → Set where
|
||||
zero : {Γ : Con} → Tm (Γ ▹ₜ)
|
||||
next : {Γ : Con} → Tm Γ → Tm (Γ ▹ₜ)
|
||||
_[_]t : {Γ Δ : Con} → Tm Γ → Sub Δ Γ → Tm Δ -- The functor's action on morphisms
|
||||
[]t-id : {Γ : Con} → {x : Tm Γ} → x [ id {Γ} ]t ≡ x
|
||||
[]t-∘ : {Γ Δ Ξ : Con} → {α : Sub Ξ Δ} → {β : Sub Δ Γ} → {t : Tm Γ} → t [ β ∘ α ]t ≡ (t [ β ]t) [ α ]t
|
||||
|
||||
-- Tm⁺
|
||||
πₜ¹ : {Γ Δ : Con} → Sub Δ (Γ ▹ₜ) → Sub Δ Γ
|
||||
πₜ² : {Γ Δ : Con} → Sub Δ (Γ ▹ₜ) → Tm Δ
|
||||
_,ₜ_ : {Γ Δ : Con} → Sub Δ Γ → Tm Δ → Sub Δ (Γ ▹ₜ)
|
||||
πₜ²∘,ₜ : {Γ Δ : Con} → {σ : Sub Δ Γ} → {t : Tm Δ} → πₜ² (σ ,ₜ t) ≡ t
|
||||
πₜ¹∘,ₜ : {Γ Δ : Con} → {σ : Sub Δ Γ} → {t : Tm Δ} → πₜ¹ (σ ,ₜ t) ≡ σ
|
||||
,ₜ∘πₜ : {Γ Δ : Con} → {σ : Sub Δ (Γ ▹ₜ)} → (πₜ¹ σ) ,ₜ (πₜ² σ) ≡ σ
|
||||
|
||||
-- Functor Con → Set called For
|
||||
_[_]f : {Γ Δ : Con} → For Γ → Sub Δ Γ → For Δ -- The functor's action on morphisms
|
||||
[]f-id : {Γ : Con} → {F : For Γ} → F [ id {Γ} ]f ≡ F
|
||||
[]f-∘ : {Γ Δ Ξ : Con} → {α : Sub Ξ Δ} → {β : Sub Δ Γ} → {F : For Γ} → F [ β ∘ α ]f ≡ (F [ β ]f) [ α ]f
|
||||
|
||||
-- Proofs
|
||||
_[_]p : {Γ Δ : Con} → {F : For Γ} → Γ ⊢ F → (σ : Sub Δ Γ) → Δ ⊢ (F [ σ ]f) -- The functor's action on morphisms
|
||||
|
||||
-- → Prop⁺
|
||||
πₚ¹ : {Γ Δ : Con} → {F : For Γ} → Sub Δ (Γ ▹ₚ F) → Sub Δ Γ
|
||||
πₚ² : {Γ Δ : Con} → {F : For Γ} → (σ : Sub Δ (Γ ▹ₚ F)) → Δ ⊢ (F [ πₚ¹ σ ]f)
|
||||
_,ₚ_ : {Γ Δ : Con} → {F : For Γ} → (σ : Sub Δ Γ) → Δ ⊢ (F [ σ ]f) → Sub Δ (Γ ▹ₚ F)
|
||||
,ₚ∘πₚ : {Γ Δ : Con} → {F : For Γ} → {σ : Sub Δ (Γ ▹ₚ F)} → (πₚ¹ σ) ,ₚ (πₚ² σ) ≡ σ
|
||||
πₚ¹∘,ₚ : {Γ Δ : Con} → {σ : Sub Δ Γ} → {F : For Γ} → {prf : Δ ⊢ (F [ σ ]f)} → πₚ¹ (σ ,ₚ prf) ≡ σ
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
-- Implication
|
||||
[]f-⇒ : {Γ Δ : Con} → {F G : For Γ} → {σ : Sub Δ Γ} → (F ⇒ G) [ σ ]f ≡ (F [ σ ]f) ⇒ (G [ σ ]f)
|
||||
|
||||
-- Forall
|
||||
[]f-∀∀ : {Γ Δ : Con} → {F : For (Γ ▹ₜ)} → {σ : Sub Δ Γ} → {t : Tm Γ} → (∀∀ F) [ σ ]f ≡ (∀∀ (F [ ((id {Γ}) ,ₜ t) ∘ σ ∘(πₜ¹ (id {Δ ▹ₜ}))]f))
|
||||
|
||||
-- Lam & App
|
||||
lam : {Γ : Con} → {F : For Γ} → {G : For Γ} → (Γ ▹ₚ F) ⊢ (G [ πₚ¹ id ]f) → Γ ⊢ (F ⇒ G)
|
||||
app : {Γ : Con} → {F G : For Γ} → Γ ⊢ (F ⇒ G) → Γ ⊢ F → Γ ⊢ G
|
||||
-- Again, we don't write the _[_]p equalities as everything is in Prop
|
||||
|
||||
-- ∀i and ∀e
|
||||
∀i : {Γ : Con} → {F : For (Γ ▹ₜ)} → (Γ ▹ₜ) ⊢ F → Γ ⊢ (∀∀ F)
|
||||
∀e : {Γ : Con} → {F : For (Γ ▹ₜ)} → Γ ⊢ (∀∀ F) → {t : Tm Γ} → Γ ⊢ ( F [(id {Γ}) ,ₜ t ]f)
|
||||
mod : FFOL
|
||||
mod = record {M}
|
||||
-}
|
||||
|
||||
-- tod : FFOL
|
||||
-- tod = record {Tarski Term}
|
||||
|
||||
{-
|
||||
module FOL (x : Abs) where
|
||||
|
||||
open Abs x
|
||||
|
||||
variable
|
||||
Γ Δ : Con
|
||||
|
||||
data Form : Con → Set where
|
||||
_⇒_ : Form Γ → Form Γ → Form Γ
|
||||
|
||||
infixr 8 _⇒_
|
||||
|
||||
vv : Set
|
||||
vv = Nat
|
||||
|
||||
record λcalculus : Set₁ where
|
||||
field
|
||||
Con : Set
|
||||
Sub : Con → Con → Set -- Prop makes a posetal category
|
||||
_=s_ : {Γ Δ : Con} → Sub Γ Δ → Sub Γ Δ → Prop
|
||||
_∘_ : {Γ Δ Ξ : Con} → Sub Γ Δ → Sub Δ Ξ → Sub Γ Ξ
|
||||
id : {Γ : Con} → Sub Γ Γ
|
||||
◇ : Con
|
||||
ε : {Γ : Con} → Sub ◇ Γ
|
||||
|
||||
Tm : Con → Set
|
||||
_=t_ : {Γ : Con} → Tm Γ → Tm Γ → Prop
|
||||
_[_] : {Γ Δ : Con} → Tm Δ → Sub Γ Δ → Tm Γ
|
||||
[∘] : {Γ Δ Ξ : Con} → {σ : Sub Γ Δ} → {δ : Sub Δ Ξ} → {t : Tm Ξ} → (t [ (σ ∘ δ) ]) =t ((t [ δ ]) [ σ ])
|
||||
[id] : {Γ : Con} → {t : Tm Γ} → (t [ id {Γ} ]) =t t
|
||||
|
||||
app : {Γ : Con} → Tm Γ → Tm Γ → Tm Γ
|
||||
app[] : {Γ Δ : Con} → {σ : Sub Γ Δ} → {x y : Tm Δ} → ((app x y) [ σ ]) =t (app (x [ σ ]) (y [ σ ]))
|
||||
|
||||
_▻_ : (Γ : Con) → Tm Γ → Con
|
||||
π₁₁ : {Γ Δ : Con} → {t : Tm Γ} → Sub Δ (Γ ▻ t) → (Sub Δ Γ)
|
||||
π₁₂ : {Γ Δ : Con} → {t : Tm Γ} → Sub Δ (Γ ▻ t) → (Tm (Γ ▻ t))
|
||||
π₂ : {Γ Δ : Con} → {t : Tm Γ} → Sub Δ Γ → Tm (Γ ▻ t) → Sub Δ (Γ ▻ t)
|
||||
|
||||
inj1 : {Γ Δ : Con} → {t : Tm Γ} → {σ : Sub Δ (Γ ▻ t)} → (π₂ (π₁₁ σ) (π₁₂ σ)) =s σ
|
||||
inj2 : {Γ Δ : Con} → {t : Tm Γ} → {σ : Sub Δ Γ} → {x : Tm (Γ ▻ t)} → (π₁₁ (π₂ σ x) =s σ) ∧ (π₁₂ (π₂ σ x) =t x )
|
||||
|
||||
lam : {Γ : Con} → {t : Tm Γ} → Tm (Γ ▻ t) → Tm Γ
|
||||
-- lam[] : {Γ Δ : Con} → {t : Tm Γ} → {σ : Sub Δ Γ} → {x : Tm (Γ ▻ t)} → ((lam x) [ σ ]) =t (lam (x [ σ ∘ (π₂ (id {Γ}) x) ]))
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
data λterm : Set where
|
||||
lam : (λterm → λterm) → λterm
|
||||
app : λterm → λterm → λterm
|
||||
|
||||
E : λterm
|
||||
E = app (lam (λ x → app x x)) (lam (λ x → app x x))
|
||||
|
||||
data _→β_ : λterm → λterm → Prop where
|
||||
βrule : {t : λterm → λterm} → {x : λterm} → (app (lam t) x) →β (t x)
|
||||
-- βtran : {x y z : λterm} → x →β y → y →β z → x →β z
|
||||
βcong1 : {x y z : λterm} → x →β y → app x z →β app y z
|
||||
βcong2 : {x y z : λterm} → x →β y → app z x →β app z y
|
||||
βcong3 : {t : λterm → λterm} → ({x y : λterm} → x →β y → t x →β t y) → lam t →β lam t
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
thm : E →β E
|
||||
thm = βrule
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
-- Proofs
|
||||
|
||||
private
|
||||
variable
|
||||
A B : Form Γ
|
||||
|
||||
data ⊢ : Form Γ → Prop where
|
||||
lam : (⊢ A → ⊢ B) → ⊢ (A ⇒ B)
|
||||
app : ⊢ (A ⇒ B) → (⊢ A → ⊢ B)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
-- We can add hypotheses to a proof
|
||||
addhyp⊢ : Γ ∈* Γ' → Γ ⊢ A → Γ' ⊢ A
|
||||
addhyp⊢ s (zero x) = zero (mon∈∈* x s)
|
||||
addhyp⊢ s (lam h) = lam (addhyp⊢ (both∈* s) h)
|
||||
addhyp⊢ s (app h h₁) = app (addhyp⊢ s h) (addhyp⊢ s h₁)
|
||||
addhyp⊢ s (andi h₁ h₂) = andi (addhyp⊢ s h₁) (addhyp⊢ s h₂)
|
||||
addhyp⊢ s (ande₁ h) = ande₁ (addhyp⊢ s h)
|
||||
addhyp⊢ s (ande₂ h) = ande₂ (addhyp⊢ s h)
|
||||
addhyp⊢ s (true) = true
|
||||
addhyp⊢ s (∀i h) = ∀i (addhyp⊢ s h)
|
||||
addhyp⊢ s (∀e h) = ∀e (addhyp⊢ s h)
|
||||
|
||||
-- Extension of ⊢ to contexts
|
||||
_⊢⁺_ : Con → Con → Prop
|
||||
Γ ⊢⁺ [] = ⊤
|
||||
Γ ⊢⁺ (F ∷ Γ') = (Γ ⊢ F) ∧ (Γ ⊢⁺ Γ')
|
||||
infix 5 _⊢⁺_
|
||||
|
||||
-- We show that the relation respects ∈*
|
||||
|
||||
mon∈*⊢⁺ : Γ' ∈* Γ → Γ ⊢⁺ Γ'
|
||||
mon∈*⊢⁺ zero∈* = tt
|
||||
mon∈*⊢⁺ (next∈* x h) = ⟨ (zero x) , (mon∈*⊢⁺ h) ⟩
|
||||
|
||||
-- The relation respects ⊆
|
||||
mon⊆⊢⁺ : Γ' ⊆ Γ → Γ ⊢⁺ Γ'
|
||||
mon⊆⊢⁺ h = mon∈*⊢⁺ (⊆→∈* h)
|
||||
|
||||
-- The relation is reflexive
|
||||
refl⊢⁺ : Γ ⊢⁺ Γ
|
||||
refl⊢⁺ {[]} = tt
|
||||
refl⊢⁺ {x ∷ Γ} = ⟨ zero zero∈ , mon⊆⊢⁺ (next⊆ zero⊆) ⟩
|
||||
|
||||
-- We can add hypotheses to to a proof
|
||||
addhyp⊢⁺ : Γ ∈* Γ' → Γ ⊢⁺ Γ'' → Γ' ⊢⁺ Γ''
|
||||
addhyp⊢⁺ {Γ'' = []} s h = tt
|
||||
addhyp⊢⁺ {Γ'' = x ∷ Γ''} s ⟨ Γx , ΓΓ'' ⟩ = ⟨ addhyp⊢ s Γx , addhyp⊢⁺ s ΓΓ'' ⟩
|
||||
|
||||
-- The relation respects ⊢
|
||||
halftran⊢⁺ : {Γ Γ' : Con} → {F : Form} → Γ ⊢⁺ Γ' → Γ' ⊢ F → Γ ⊢ F
|
||||
halftran⊢⁺ {Γ' = F ∷ Γ'} h⁺ (zero zero∈) = proj₁ h⁺
|
||||
halftran⊢⁺ {Γ' = F ∷ Γ'} h⁺ (zero (next∈ x)) = halftran⊢⁺ (proj₂ h⁺) (zero x)
|
||||
halftran⊢⁺ h⁺ (lam h) = lam (halftran⊢⁺ ⟨ (zero zero∈) , (addhyp⊢⁺ (right∈* refl∈*) h⁺) ⟩ h)
|
||||
halftran⊢⁺ h⁺ (app h h₁) = app (halftran⊢⁺ h⁺ h) (halftran⊢⁺ h⁺ h₁)
|
||||
halftran⊢⁺ h⁺ (andi hf hg) = andi (halftran⊢⁺ h⁺ hf) (halftran⊢⁺ h⁺ hg)
|
||||
halftran⊢⁺ h⁺ (ande₁ hfg) = ande₁ (halftran⊢⁺ h⁺ hfg)
|
||||
halftran⊢⁺ h⁺ (ande₂ hfg) = ande₂ (halftran⊢⁺ h⁺ hfg)
|
||||
halftran⊢⁺ h⁺ (true) = true
|
||||
halftran⊢⁺ h⁺ (∀i h) = ∀i (halftran⊢⁺ h⁺ h)
|
||||
halftran⊢⁺ h⁺ (∀e h {t}) = ∀e (halftran⊢⁺ h⁺ h)
|
||||
|
||||
-- The relation is transitive
|
||||
tran⊢⁺ : {Γ Γ' Γ'' : Con} → Γ ⊢⁺ Γ' → Γ' ⊢⁺ Γ'' → Γ ⊢⁺ Γ''
|
||||
tran⊢⁺ {Γ'' = []} h h' = tt
|
||||
tran⊢⁺ {Γ'' = x ∷ Γ*} h h' = ⟨ halftran⊢⁺ h (proj₁ h') , tran⊢⁺ h (proj₂ h') ⟩
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
{--- DEFINITIONS OF ⊢⁰ and ⊢* ---}
|
||||
|
||||
-- ⊢⁰ are neutral forms
|
||||
-- ⊢* are normal forms
|
||||
data _⊢⁰_ : Con → Form → Prop
|
||||
data _⊢*_ : Con → Form → Prop
|
||||
data _⊢⁰_ where
|
||||
zero : A ∈ Γ → Γ ⊢⁰ A
|
||||
app : Γ ⊢⁰ (A ⇒ B) → Γ ⊢* A → Γ ⊢⁰ B
|
||||
ande₁ : Γ ⊢⁰ A ∧∧ B → Γ ⊢⁰ A
|
||||
ande₂ : Γ ⊢⁰ A ∧∧ B → Γ ⊢⁰ B
|
||||
∀e : {F : Term → Form} → Γ ⊢⁰ (∀∀ F) → ( {t : Term} → Γ ⊢⁰ (F t) )
|
||||
data _⊢*_ where
|
||||
neu⁰ : Γ ⊢⁰ Rel r ts → Γ ⊢* Rel r ts
|
||||
lam : (A ∷ Γ) ⊢* B → Γ ⊢* (A ⇒ B)
|
||||
andi : Γ ⊢* A → Γ ⊢* B → Γ ⊢* (A ∧∧ B)
|
||||
∀i : {F : Term → Form} → ({t : Term} → Γ ⊢* F t) → Γ ⊢* ∀∀ F
|
||||
true : Γ ⊢* ⊤⊤
|
||||
infix 5 _⊢⁰_
|
||||
infix 5 _⊢*_
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
-- We can add hypotheses to a proof
|
||||
addhyp⊢⁰ : Γ ∈* Γ' → Γ ⊢⁰ A → Γ' ⊢⁰ A
|
||||
addhyp⊢* : Γ ∈* Γ' → Γ ⊢* A → Γ' ⊢* A
|
||||
addhyp⊢⁰ s (zero x) = zero (mon∈∈* x s)
|
||||
addhyp⊢⁰ s (app h h₁) = app (addhyp⊢⁰ s h) (addhyp⊢* s h₁)
|
||||
addhyp⊢⁰ s (ande₁ h) = ande₁ (addhyp⊢⁰ s h)
|
||||
addhyp⊢⁰ s (ande₂ h) = ande₂ (addhyp⊢⁰ s h)
|
||||
addhyp⊢⁰ s (∀e h {t}) = ∀e (addhyp⊢⁰ s h) {t}
|
||||
addhyp⊢* s (neu⁰ x) = neu⁰ (addhyp⊢⁰ s x)
|
||||
addhyp⊢* s (lam h) = lam (addhyp⊢* (both∈* s) h)
|
||||
addhyp⊢* s (andi h₁ h₂) = andi (addhyp⊢* s h₁) (addhyp⊢* s h₂)
|
||||
addhyp⊢* s true = true
|
||||
addhyp⊢* s (∀i h) = ∀i (addhyp⊢* s h)
|
||||
|
||||
-- Extension of ⊢⁰ to contexts
|
||||
-- i.e. there is a neutral proof for any element
|
||||
_⊢⁰⁺_ : Con → Con → Prop
|
||||
Γ ⊢⁰⁺ [] = ⊤
|
||||
Γ ⊢⁰⁺ (F ∷ Γ') = (Γ ⊢⁰ F) ∧ (Γ ⊢⁰⁺ Γ')
|
||||
infix 5 _⊢⁰⁺_
|
||||
|
||||
-- The relation respects ∈*
|
||||
|
||||
mon∈*⊢⁰⁺ : Γ' ∈* Γ → Γ ⊢⁰⁺ Γ'
|
||||
mon∈*⊢⁰⁺ zero∈* = tt
|
||||
mon∈*⊢⁰⁺ (next∈* x h) = ⟨ (zero x) , (mon∈*⊢⁰⁺ h) ⟩
|
||||
|
||||
-- The relation respects ⊆
|
||||
mon⊆⊢⁰⁺ : Γ' ⊆ Γ → Γ ⊢⁰⁺ Γ'
|
||||
mon⊆⊢⁰⁺ h = mon∈*⊢⁰⁺ (⊆→∈* h)
|
||||
|
||||
-- This relation is reflexive
|
||||
refl⊢⁰⁺ : Γ ⊢⁰⁺ Γ
|
||||
refl⊢⁰⁺ {[]} = tt
|
||||
refl⊢⁰⁺ {x ∷ Γ} = ⟨ zero zero∈ , mon⊆⊢⁰⁺ (next⊆ zero⊆) ⟩
|
||||
|
||||
-- A useful lemma, that we can add hypotheses
|
||||
addhyp⊢⁰⁺ : Γ ∈* Γ' → Γ ⊢⁰⁺ Γ'' → Γ' ⊢⁰⁺ Γ''
|
||||
addhyp⊢⁰⁺ {Γ'' = []} s h = tt
|
||||
addhyp⊢⁰⁺ {Γ'' = A ∷ Γ'} s ⟨ Γx , ΓΓ'' ⟩ = ⟨ addhyp⊢⁰ s Γx , addhyp⊢⁰⁺ s ΓΓ'' ⟩
|
||||
|
||||
-- The relation preserves ⊢⁰ and ⊢*
|
||||
halftran⊢⁰⁺* : {Γ Γ' : Con} → {F : Form} → Γ ⊢⁰⁺ Γ' → Γ' ⊢* F → Γ ⊢* F
|
||||
halftran⊢⁰⁺⁰ : {Γ Γ' : Con} → {F : Form} → Γ ⊢⁰⁺ Γ' → Γ' ⊢⁰ F → Γ ⊢⁰ F
|
||||
halftran⊢⁰⁺* h⁺ (neu⁰ x) = neu⁰ (halftran⊢⁰⁺⁰ h⁺ x)
|
||||
halftran⊢⁰⁺* h⁺ (lam h) = lam (halftran⊢⁰⁺* ⟨ zero zero∈ , addhyp⊢⁰⁺ (right∈* refl∈*) h⁺ ⟩ h)
|
||||
halftran⊢⁰⁺* h⁺ (andi h₁ h₂) = andi (halftran⊢⁰⁺* h⁺ h₁) (halftran⊢⁰⁺* h⁺ h₂)
|
||||
halftran⊢⁰⁺* h⁺ true = true
|
||||
halftran⊢⁰⁺* h⁺ (∀i h) = ∀i (halftran⊢⁰⁺* h⁺ h)
|
||||
halftran⊢⁰⁺⁰ {Γ' = x ∷ Γ'} h⁺ (zero zero∈) = proj₁ h⁺
|
||||
halftran⊢⁰⁺⁰ {Γ' = x ∷ Γ'} h⁺ (zero (next∈ h)) = halftran⊢⁰⁺⁰ (proj₂ h⁺) (zero h)
|
||||
halftran⊢⁰⁺⁰ h⁺ (app h h') = app (halftran⊢⁰⁺⁰ h⁺ h) (halftran⊢⁰⁺* h⁺ h')
|
||||
halftran⊢⁰⁺⁰ h⁺ (ande₁ h) = ande₁ (halftran⊢⁰⁺⁰ h⁺ h)
|
||||
halftran⊢⁰⁺⁰ h⁺ (ande₂ h) = ande₂ (halftran⊢⁰⁺⁰ h⁺ h)
|
||||
halftran⊢⁰⁺⁰ h⁺ (∀e h {t}) = ∀e (halftran⊢⁰⁺⁰ h⁺ h)
|
||||
|
||||
-- The relation is transitive
|
||||
tran⊢⁰⁺ : {Γ Γ' Γ'' : Con} → Γ ⊢⁰⁺ Γ' → Γ' ⊢⁰⁺ Γ'' → Γ ⊢⁰⁺ Γ''
|
||||
tran⊢⁰⁺ {Γ'' = []} h h' = tt
|
||||
tran⊢⁰⁺ {Γ'' = x ∷ Γ} h h' = ⟨ halftran⊢⁰⁺⁰ h (proj₁ h') , tran⊢⁰⁺ h (proj₂ h') ⟩
|
||||
|
||||
-}
|
||||
|
||||
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user