\begin{code} {-# OPTIONS --prop --rewriting #-} open import PropUtil module IFOL2 where open import Agda.Primitive open import ListUtil variable ℓ¹ ℓ² ℓ³ ℓ⁴ : Level ℓ¹' ℓ²' ℓ³' ℓ⁴' : Level record IFOL (TM : Set) : Set (lsuc (ℓ¹ ⊔ ℓ² ⊔ ℓ³ ⊔ ℓ⁴)) where infixr 10 _∘_ field -- We first make the base category with its terminal object Con : Set ℓ¹ Sub : Con → Con → Prop ℓ² -- It makes a category _∘_ : {Γ Δ Ξ : Con} → Sub Δ Ξ → Sub Γ Δ → Sub Γ Ξ id : {Γ : Con} → Sub Γ Γ ◇ : Con -- The terminal object of the category ε : {Γ : Con} → Sub Γ ◇ -- The morphism from any object to the terminal -- Functor Con → Set called For For : Con → Set ℓ³ _[_]f : {Γ Δ : Con} → For Γ → Sub Δ Γ → For Δ -- Action on morphisms []f-id : {Γ : Con} → {F : For Γ} → F [ id {Γ} ]f ≡ F []f-∘ : {Γ Δ Ξ : Con} → {α : Sub Ξ Δ} → {β : Sub Δ Γ} → {F : For Γ} → F [ β ∘ α ]f ≡ (F [ β ]f) [ α ]f -- Functor Con × For → Prop called Pf or ⊢ Pf : (Γ : Con) → For Γ → Prop ℓ⁴ -- Action on morphisms _[_]p : {Γ Δ : Con} → {F : For Γ} → Pf Γ F → (σ : Sub Δ Γ) → Pf Δ (F [ σ ]f) -- Equalities below are useless because Γ ⊢ F is in prop -- []p-id : {Γ : Con} → {F : For Γ} → {prf : Γ ⊢ F} -- → prf [ id {Γ} ]p ≡ prf -- []p-∘ : {Γ Δ Ξ : Con}{α : Sub Ξ Δ}{β : Sub Δ Γ}{F : For Γ}{prf : Γ ⊢ F} -- → prf [ α ∘ β ]p ≡ (prf [ β ]p) [ α ]p -- → Prop⁺ _▹ₚ_ : (Γ : Con) → For Γ → Con πₚ¹ : {Γ Δ : Con}{F : For Γ} → Sub Δ (Γ ▹ₚ F) → Sub Δ Γ πₚ² : {Γ Δ : Con}{F : For Γ} → (σ : Sub Δ (Γ ▹ₚ F)) → Pf Δ (F [ πₚ¹ σ ]f) _,ₚ_ : {Γ Δ : Con}{F : For Γ} → (σ : Sub Δ Γ) → Pf Δ (F [ σ ]f) → Sub Δ (Γ ▹ₚ F) -- Equality below is useless because Pf Γ F is in Prop -- πₚ²∘,ₚ : {Γ Δ : Con}{σ : Sub Δ Γ}{F : For Γ}{prf : Pf Δ (F [ σ ]f)} -- → πₚ² (σ ,ₚ prf) ≡ prf {-- FORMULAE CONSTRUCTORS --} -- Formulas with relation on terms R : {Γ : Con} → (t u : TM) → For Γ R[] : {Γ Δ : Con} → {σ : Sub Δ Γ} → {t u : TM} → (R t u) [ σ ]f ≡ R t u -- Implication _⇒_ : {Γ : Con} → For Γ → For Γ → For Γ []f-⇒ : {Γ Δ : Con} → {F G : For Γ} → {σ : Sub Δ Γ} → (F ⇒ G) [ σ ]f ≡ (F [ σ ]f) ⇒ (G [ σ ]f) --# Forall ∀∀ : {Γ : Con} → (TM → For Γ) → For Γ []f-∀∀ : {Γ Δ : Con} → {F : TM → For Γ} → {σ : Sub Δ Γ} → (∀∀ F) [ σ ]f ≡ (∀∀ (λ t → (F t) [ σ ]f)) --# {-- PROOFS CONSTRUCTORS --} -- Again, we don't have to write the _[_]p equalities as Proofs are in Prop -- Lam & App lam : {Γ : Con}{F G : For Γ} → Pf (Γ ▹ₚ F) (G [ πₚ¹ id ]f) → Pf Γ (F ⇒ G) app : {Γ : Con}{F G : For Γ} → Pf Γ (F ⇒ G) → Pf Γ F → Pf Γ G --# ∀i and ∀e ∀i : {Γ : Con}{A : TM → For Γ} → ((t : TM) → Pf Γ (A t)) → Pf Γ (∀∀ A) ∀e : {Γ : Con}{A : TM → For Γ} → Pf Γ (∀∀ A) → (t : TM) → Pf Γ (A t) --# record Mapping (TM : Set) (S : IFOL {ℓ¹} {ℓ²} {ℓ³} {ℓ⁴} TM) (D : IFOL {ℓ¹'} {ℓ²'} {ℓ³'} {ℓ⁴'} TM) : Set (lsuc (ℓ¹ ⊔ ℓ² ⊔ ℓ³ ⊔ ℓ⁴ ⊔ ℓ¹' ⊔ ℓ²' ⊔ ℓ³' ⊔ ℓ⁴')) where field -- We first make the base category with its final object mCon : (IFOL.Con S) → (IFOL.Con D) mSub : {Δ : (IFOL.Con S)}{Γ : (IFOL.Con S)} → (IFOL.Sub S Δ Γ) → (IFOL.Sub D (mCon Δ) (mCon Γ)) mFor : {Γ : (IFOL.Con S)} → (IFOL.For S Γ) → (IFOL.For D (mCon Γ)) mPf : {Γ : (IFOL.Con S)} {A : IFOL.For S Γ} → IFOL.Pf S Γ A → IFOL.Pf D (mCon Γ) (mFor A) record Morphism (TM : Set)(S : IFOL {ℓ¹} {ℓ²} {ℓ³} {ℓ⁴} TM) (D : IFOL {ℓ¹'} {ℓ²'} {ℓ³'} {ℓ⁴'} TM) : Set (lsuc (ℓ¹ ⊔ ℓ² ⊔ ℓ³ ⊔ ℓ⁴ ⊔ ℓ¹' ⊔ ℓ²' ⊔ ℓ³' ⊔ ℓ⁴')) where field m : Mapping TM S D mCon = Mapping.mCon m mSub = Mapping.mSub m mFor = Mapping.mFor m mPf = Mapping.mPf m field e◇ : mCon (IFOL.◇ S) ≡ IFOL.◇ D e[]f : {Γ Δ : IFOL.Con S}{A : IFOL.For S Γ}{σ : IFOL.Sub S Δ Γ} → mFor (IFOL._[_]f S A σ) ≡ IFOL._[_]f D (mFor A) (mSub σ) -- Proofs are in prop, so some equations are not needed --[]p : {Γ Δ : IFOL.Con S}{A : IFOL.For S Γ}{pf : IFOL._⊢_ S Γ A}{σ : IFOL.Sub S Δ Γ} → mPf (IFOL._[_]p S pf σ) ≡ IFOL._[_]p D (mPf pf) (mSub σ) e▹ₚ : {Γ : IFOL.Con S}{A : IFOL.For S Γ} → mCon (IFOL._▹ₚ_ S Γ A) ≡ IFOL._▹ₚ_ D (mCon Γ) (mFor A) --πₚ² : {Γ Δ : IFOL.Con S}{A : IFOL.For S Γ}{σ : IFOL.Sub S Δ (IFOL._▹ₚ_ S Γ A)} → mPf (IFOL.πₚ² S σ) ≡ IFOL.πₚ¹ D (subst (IFOL.Sub D (mCon Δ)) ▹ₚ (mSub σ)) eR : {Γ : IFOL.Con S}{t u : TM} → mFor {Γ} (IFOL.R S t u) ≡ IFOL.R D t u e⇒ : {Γ : IFOL.Con S}{A B : IFOL.For S Γ} → mFor (IFOL._⇒_ S A B) ≡ IFOL._⇒_ D (mFor A) (mFor B) e∀∀ : {Γ : IFOL.Con S}{A : TM → IFOL.For S Γ} → mFor (IFOL.∀∀ S A) ≡ IFOL.∀∀ D (λ t → (mFor (A t))) -- No equation needed for lam, app, ∀i, ∀e as their output are in prop record TrNat {TM : Set}{S : IFOL {ℓ¹} {ℓ²} {ℓ³} {ℓ⁴} TM} {D : IFOL {ℓ¹'} {ℓ²'} {ℓ³'} {ℓ⁴'} TM} (a : Mapping TM S D) (b : Mapping TM S D) : Set (lsuc (ℓ¹ ⊔ ℓ² ⊔ ℓ³ ⊔ ℓ⁴ ⊔ ℓ¹' ⊔ ℓ²' ⊔ ℓ³' ⊔ ℓ⁴')) where field f : (Γ : IFOL.Con S) → IFOL.Sub D (Mapping.mCon a Γ) (Mapping.mCon b Γ) -- Unneeded because Sub are in prop --eq : (Γ Δ : IFOL.Con S)(σ : IFOL.Sub S Γ Δ) → (IFOL._∘_ D (f Δ) (Mapping.mSub a σ)) ≡ (IFOL._∘_ D (Mapping.mSub b σ) (f Γ)) _∘TrNat_ : {TM : Set}{S : IFOL {ℓ¹} {ℓ²} {ℓ³} {ℓ⁴} TM}{D : IFOL {ℓ¹'} {ℓ²'} {ℓ³'} {ℓ⁴'} TM}{a b c : Mapping TM S D} → TrNat a b → TrNat b c → TrNat a c _∘TrNat_ {D = D} α β = record { f = λ Γ → IFOL._∘_ D (TrNat.f β Γ) (TrNat.f α Γ) } idTrNat : {TM : Set}{S : IFOL {ℓ¹} {ℓ²} {ℓ³} {ℓ⁴} TM}{D : IFOL {ℓ¹'} {ℓ²'} {ℓ³'} {ℓ⁴'} TM}{a : Mapping TM S D} → TrNat a a idTrNat {D = D} = record { f = λ Γ → IFOL.id D } \end{code}