m1-internship/report/Bilibibio.bib

90 lines
3.6 KiB
BibTeX
Raw Permalink Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters

This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.

@article{NBE2016,
title={Normalisation by Evaluation for Dependent Types},
author={Thorsten Altenkirch and Ambrus Kaposi},
booktitle={International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction},
year={2016}
}
@phdthesis{AltenkirschThesis1993,
title={Constructions, inductive types and strong normalization},
author={Thorsten Altenkirch},
booktitle={CST},
year={1993}
}
@unpublished{TaoOfTypes,
title={The Tao of Types},
author={Thorsten Altenkirsch}
}
@inproceedings{folSogatKaposi2023,
title={Why is equality interesting?},
author={Ambrus Kaposi},
url={https://akaposi.github.io/pres_wld.pdf}}
@phdthesis{UemuraThesis2021,
title = {Abstract and concrete type theories},
isbn = {9789464213768},
url = {https://dare.uva.nl/search?identifier=41ff0b60-64d4-4003-8182-c244a9afab3b},
language = {en},
urldate = {2023-08-04},
publisher = {AmsterdamInstitute for Logic, Language and Computation},
author = {Uemura, T.},
year = {2021},
}
@article{logicalFramework1993,
author = {Harper, Robert and Honsell, Furio and Plotkin, Gordon},
title = {A Framework for Defining Logics},
year = {1993},
issue_date = {Jan. 1993},
publisher = {Association for Computing Machinery},
address = {New York, NY, USA},
volume = {40},
number = {1},
issn = {0004-5411},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1145/138027.138060},
doi = {10.1145/138027.138060},
abstract = {The Edinburgh Logical Framework (LF) provides a means to define (or present) logics. It is based on a general treatment of syntax, rules, and proofs by means of a typed λ-calculus with dependent types. Syntax is treated in a style similar to, but more general than, Martin-Lo¨f's system of arities. The treatment of rules and proofs focuses on his notion of a judgment. Logics are represented in LF via a new principle, the judgments as types principle, whereby each judgment is identified with the type of its proofs. This allows for a smooth treatment of discharge and variable occurence conditions and leads to a uniform treatment of rules and proofs whereby rules are viewed as proofs of higher-order judgments and proof checking is reduced to type checking. The practical benefit of our treatment of formal systems is that logic-independent tools, such as proof editors and proof checkers, can be constructed.},
journal = {J. ACM},
month = {jan},
pages = {143184},
numpages = {42},
keywords = {formal systems, interactive theorem proving, proof checking, typed lambda calculus}
}
@article{hoffmann1999,
author = {Hofmann, Martin},
title = {Semantical Analysis of Higher-Order Abstract Syntax},
year = {1999},
isbn = {0769501583},
publisher = {IEEE Computer Society},
address = {USA},
abstract = {A functor category semantics for higher-order abstract syntax is proposed with the following aims: relating higher-order and first order syntax, justifying induction principles, suggesting new logical principles to reason about higher-order syntax},
booktitle = {Proceedings of the 14th Annual IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science},
pages = {204},
series = {LICS '99}
}
@article{fioreMahmoud2013secondorder,
title={Second-Order Algebraic Theories},
author={Marcelo Fiore and Ola Mahmoud},
year={2013},
eprint={1308.5409},
archivePrefix={arXiv},
primaryClass={cs.LO}
}
@article{RedFreeNorm1995,
doi = {10.1007/3-540-60164-3_27},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1007\3-540-60164-3_27},
year = 1995,
publisher = {Springer Berlin Heidelberg},
pages = {182--199},
author = {Thorsten Altenkirch and Martin Hofmann and Thomas Streicher},
title = {Categorical reconstruction of a reduction free normalization proof},
booktitle = {Category Theory and Computer Science}
}