m1-internship/IFOL2.lagda
2023-08-16 13:24:55 +02:00

121 lines
6.4 KiB
Plaintext
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters

This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.

\begin{code}
{-# OPTIONS --prop --rewriting #-}
open import PropUtil
module IFOL2 where
open import Agda.Primitive
open import ListUtil
variable
ℓ¹ ℓ² ℓ³ ℓ⁴ : Level
ℓ¹' ℓ²' ℓ³' ℓ⁴' : Level
record IFOL (TM : Set) : Set (lsuc (ℓ¹ ⊔ ℓ² ⊔ ℓ³ ⊔ ℓ⁴)) where
infixr 10 _∘_
field
-- We first make the base category with its terminal object
Con : Set ℓ¹
Sub : Con → Con → Prop ℓ² -- It makes a category
_∘_ : {Γ Δ Ξ : Con} → Sub Δ Ξ → Sub Γ Δ → Sub Γ Ξ
id : {Γ : Con} → Sub Γ Γ
◇ : Con -- The terminal object of the category
ε : {Γ : Con} → Sub Γ ◇ -- The morphism from any object to the terminal
-- Functor Con → Set called For
For : Con → Set ℓ³
_[_]f : {Γ Δ : Con} → For Γ → Sub Δ Γ → For Δ -- Action on morphisms
[]f-id : {Γ : Con} → {F : For Γ} → F [ id {Γ} ]f ≡ F
[]f-∘ : {Γ Δ Ξ : Con} → {α : Sub Ξ Δ} → {β : Sub Δ Γ} → {F : For Γ}
→ F [ β ∘ α ]f ≡ (F [ β ]f) [ α ]f
-- Functor Con × For → Prop called Pf or ⊢
Pf : (Γ : Con) → For Γ → Prop ℓ⁴
-- Action on morphisms
_[_]p : {Γ Δ : Con} → {F : For Γ} → Pf Γ F → (σ : Sub Δ Γ) → Pf Δ (F [ σ ]f)
-- Equalities below are useless because Γ ⊢ F is in prop
-- []p-id : {Γ : Con} → {F : For Γ} → {prf : Γ ⊢ F}
-- → prf [ id {Γ} ]p ≡ prf
-- []p-∘ : {Γ Δ Ξ : Con}{α : Sub Ξ Δ}{β : Sub Δ Γ}{F : For Γ}{prf : Γ ⊢ F}
-- → prf [ α ∘ β ]p ≡ (prf [ β ]p) [ α ]p
-- → Prop⁺
_▹ₚ_ : (Γ : Con) → For Γ → Con
πₚ¹ : {Γ Δ : Con}{F : For Γ} → Sub Δ (Γ ▹ₚ F) → Sub Δ Γ
πₚ² : {Γ Δ : Con}{F : For Γ} → (σ : Sub Δ (Γ ▹ₚ F)) → Pf Δ (F [ πₚ¹ σ ]f)
_,ₚ_ : {Γ Δ : Con}{F : For Γ} → (σ : Sub Δ Γ) → Pf Δ (F [ σ ]f) → Sub Δ (Γ ▹ₚ F)
-- All equalities are useless because Sub and Pf are in prop
{-- FORMULAE CONSTRUCTORS --}
-- Formulas with relation on terms
R : {Γ : Con} → (t u : TM) → For Γ
R[] : {Γ Δ : Con} → {σ : Sub Δ Γ} → {t u : TM}
→ (R t u) [ σ ]f ≡ R t u
-- Implication
_⇒_ : {Γ : Con} → For Γ → For Γ → For Γ
[]f-⇒ : {Γ Δ : Con} → {F G : For Γ} → {σ : Sub Δ Γ}
→ (F ⇒ G) [ σ ]f ≡ (F [ σ ]f) ⇒ (G [ σ ]f)
--# Forall
∀∀ : {Γ : Con} → (TM → For Γ) → For Γ
[]f-∀∀ : {Γ Δ : Con} → {F : TM → For Γ} → {σ : Sub Δ Γ}
→ (∀∀ F) [ σ ]f ≡ (∀∀ (λ t → (F t) [ σ ]f))
--#
{-- PROOFS CONSTRUCTORS --}
-- Again, we don't have to write the _[_]p equalities as Proofs are in Prop
-- Lam & App
lam : {Γ : Con}{F G : For Γ} → Pf (Γ ▹ₚ F) (G [ πₚ¹ id ]f) → Pf Γ (F ⇒ G)
app : {Γ : Con}{F G : For Γ} → Pf Γ (F ⇒ G) → Pf Γ F → Pf Γ G
--# ∀i and ∀e
∀i : {Γ : Con}{A : TM → For Γ} → ((t : TM) → Pf Γ (A t)) → Pf Γ (∀∀ A)
∀e : {Γ : Con}{A : TM → For Γ} → Pf Γ (∀∀ A) → (t : TM) → Pf Γ (A t)
--#
record Mapping (TM : Set) (S : IFOL {ℓ¹} {ℓ²} {ℓ³} {ℓ⁴} TM) (D : IFOL {ℓ¹'} {ℓ²'} {ℓ³'} {ℓ⁴'} TM) : Set (lsuc (ℓ¹ ⊔ ℓ² ⊔ ℓ³ ⊔ ℓ⁴ ⊔ ℓ¹' ⊔ ℓ²' ⊔ ℓ³' ⊔ ℓ⁴')) where
field
-- We first make the base category with its final object
mCon : (IFOL.Con S) → (IFOL.Con D)
mSub : {Δ : (IFOL.Con S)}{Γ : (IFOL.Con S)} → (IFOL.Sub S Δ Γ) → (IFOL.Sub D (mCon Δ) (mCon Γ))
mFor : {Γ : (IFOL.Con S)} → (IFOL.For S Γ) → (IFOL.For D (mCon Γ))
mPf : {Γ : (IFOL.Con S)} {A : IFOL.For S Γ} → IFOL.Pf S Γ A → IFOL.Pf D (mCon Γ) (mFor A)
record Morphism (TM : Set)(S : IFOL {ℓ¹} {ℓ²} {ℓ³} {ℓ⁴} TM) (D : IFOL {ℓ¹'} {ℓ²'} {ℓ³'} {ℓ⁴'} TM) : Set (lsuc (ℓ¹ ⊔ ℓ² ⊔ ℓ³ ⊔ ℓ⁴ ⊔ ℓ¹' ⊔ ℓ²' ⊔ ℓ³' ⊔ ℓ⁴')) where
field m : Mapping TM S D
mCon = Mapping.mCon m
mSub = Mapping.mSub m
mFor = Mapping.mFor m
mPf = Mapping.mPf m
field
e◇ : mCon (IFOL.◇ S) ≡ IFOL.◇ D
e[]f : {Γ Δ : IFOL.Con S}{A : IFOL.For S Γ}{σ : IFOL.Sub S Δ Γ} → mFor (IFOL._[_]f S A σ) ≡ IFOL._[_]f D (mFor A) (mSub σ)
-- Proofs are in prop, so some equations are not needed
--[]p : {Γ Δ : IFOL.Con S}{A : IFOL.For S Γ}{pf : IFOL._⊢_ S Γ A}{σ : IFOL.Sub S Δ Γ} → mPf (IFOL._[_]p S pf σ) ≡ IFOL._[_]p D (mPf pf) (mSub σ)
e▹ₚ : {Γ : IFOL.Con S}{A : IFOL.For S Γ} → mCon (IFOL._▹ₚ_ S Γ A) ≡ IFOL._▹ₚ_ D (mCon Γ) (mFor A)
--πₚ² : {Γ Δ : IFOL.Con S}{A : IFOL.For S Γ}{σ : IFOL.Sub S Δ (IFOL._▹ₚ_ S Γ A)} → mPf (IFOL.πₚ² S σ) ≡ IFOL.πₚ¹ D (subst (IFOL.Sub D (mCon Δ)) ▹ₚ (mSub σ))
eR : {Γ : IFOL.Con S}{t u : TM} → mFor {Γ} (IFOL.R S t u) ≡ IFOL.R D t u
e⇒ : {Γ : IFOL.Con S}{A B : IFOL.For S Γ} → mFor (IFOL._⇒_ S A B) ≡ IFOL._⇒_ D (mFor A) (mFor B)
e∀∀ : {Γ : IFOL.Con S}{A : TM → IFOL.For S Γ} → mFor (IFOL.∀∀ S A) ≡ IFOL.∀∀ D (λ t → (mFor (A t)))
-- No equation needed for lam, app, ∀i, ∀e as their output are in prop
record TrNat {TM : Set}{S : IFOL {ℓ¹} {ℓ²} {ℓ³} {ℓ⁴} TM} {D : IFOL {ℓ¹'} {ℓ²'} {ℓ³'} {ℓ⁴'} TM} (a : Mapping TM S D) (b : Mapping TM S D) : Set (lsuc (ℓ¹ ⊔ ℓ² ⊔ ℓ³ ⊔ ℓ⁴ ⊔ ℓ¹' ⊔ ℓ²' ⊔ ℓ³' ⊔ ℓ⁴')) where
field
f : (Γ : IFOL.Con S) → IFOL.Sub D (Mapping.mCon a Γ) (Mapping.mCon b Γ)
-- Unneeded because Sub are in prop
--eq : (Γ Δ : IFOL.Con S)(σ : IFOL.Sub S Γ Δ) → (IFOL._∘_ D (f Δ) (Mapping.mSub a σ)) ≡ (IFOL._∘_ D (Mapping.mSub b σ) (f Γ))
_∘TrNat_ : {TM : Set}{S : IFOL {ℓ¹} {ℓ²} {ℓ³} {ℓ⁴} TM}{D : IFOL {ℓ¹'} {ℓ²'} {ℓ³'} {ℓ⁴'} TM}{a b c : Mapping TM S D} → TrNat a b → TrNat b c → TrNat a c
_∘TrNat_ {D = D} α β = record { f = λ Γ → IFOL._∘_ D (TrNat.f β Γ) (TrNat.f α Γ) }
idTrNat : {TM : Set}{S : IFOL {ℓ¹} {ℓ²} {ℓ³} {ℓ⁴} TM}{D : IFOL {ℓ¹'} {ℓ²'} {ℓ³'} {ℓ⁴'} TM}{a : Mapping TM S D} → TrNat a a
idTrNat {D = D} = record { f = λ Γ → IFOL.id D }
\end{code}