Added some proof examples that works for the Tarski model Rewrite (again) of the syntax, still not working
286 lines
11 KiB
Agda
286 lines
11 KiB
Agda
{-# OPTIONS --prop #-}
|
||
|
||
open import PropUtil
|
||
|
||
module FFOLInitial (F : Nat → Set) (R : Nat → Set) where
|
||
|
||
open import FinitaryFirstOrderLogic F R
|
||
open import Agda.Primitive
|
||
open import ListUtil
|
||
|
||
variable
|
||
n : Nat
|
||
|
||
-- First definition of terms and term contexts --
|
||
data Cont : Set₁ where
|
||
◇t : Cont
|
||
_▹t⁰ : Cont → Cont
|
||
variable
|
||
Γₜ Δₜ Ξₜ : Cont
|
||
data TmVar : Cont → Set₁ where
|
||
tvzero : TmVar (Γₜ ▹t⁰)
|
||
tvnext : TmVar Γₜ → TmVar (Γₜ ▹t⁰)
|
||
|
||
data Tm : Cont → Set₁ where
|
||
var : TmVar Γₜ → Tm Γₜ
|
||
fun : F n → Array (Tm Γₜ) n → Tm Γₜ
|
||
|
||
-- Now we can define formulæ
|
||
data For : Cont → Set₁ where
|
||
rel : R n → Array (Tm Γₜ) n → For Γₜ
|
||
_⇒_ : For Γₜ → For Γₜ → For Γₜ
|
||
∀∀ : For (Γₜ ▹t⁰) → For Γₜ
|
||
|
||
-- Then we define term substitutions, and the application of them on terms and formulæ
|
||
data Subt : Cont → Cont → Set₁ where
|
||
εₜ : Subt Γₜ ◇t
|
||
wk▹t : Subt Δₜ Γₜ → Tm Δₜ → Subt Δₜ (Γₜ ▹t⁰)
|
||
|
||
-- We subst on terms
|
||
_[_]t : Tm Γₜ → Subt Δₜ Γₜ → Tm Δₜ
|
||
_[_]tz : Array (Tm Γₜ) n → Subt Δₜ Γₜ → Array (Tm Δₜ) n
|
||
var tvzero [ wk▹t σ t ]t = t
|
||
var (tvnext tv) [ wk▹t σ t ]t = var tv [ σ ]t
|
||
fun f tz [ σ ]t = fun f (tz [ σ ]tz)
|
||
zero [ σ ]tz = zero
|
||
next t tz [ σ ]tz = next (t [ σ ]t) (tz [ σ ]tz)
|
||
|
||
-- We define liftings on term variables
|
||
-- A term of n variables is a term of n+1 variables
|
||
liftt : Tm Γₜ → Tm (Γₜ ▹t⁰)
|
||
-- Same for a term array
|
||
lifttz : Array (Tm Γₜ) n → Array (Tm (Γₜ ▹t⁰)) n
|
||
liftt (var tv) = var (tvnext tv)
|
||
liftt (fun f tz) = fun f (lifttz tz)
|
||
lifttz zero = zero
|
||
lifttz (next t tz) = next (liftt t) (lifttz tz)
|
||
-- From a substitution into n variables, we construct a substitution from n+1 variables to n+1 variables which maps it to itself
|
||
-- i.e. 0 -> 0 and for all i ->(old) σ(i) we get i+1 -> σ(i)+1
|
||
lift : Subt Δₜ Γₜ → Subt (Δₜ ▹t⁰) (Γₜ ▹t⁰)
|
||
lift εₜ = wk▹t εₜ (var tvzero)
|
||
lift (wk▹t σ t) = wk▹t (lift σ) (liftt t)
|
||
-- From a substition into n variables, we get a substitution into n+1 variables which don't use the last one
|
||
llift : Subt Δₜ Γₜ → Subt (Δₜ ▹t⁰) Γₜ
|
||
llift εₜ = εₜ
|
||
llift (wk▹t σ t) = wk▹t (llift σ) (liftt t)
|
||
|
||
-- We subst on formulæ
|
||
_[_]f : For Γₜ → Subt Δₜ Γₜ → For Δₜ
|
||
(rel r tz) [ σ ]f = rel r ((map (λ t → t [ σ ]t) tz))
|
||
(A ⇒ B) [ σ ]f = (A [ σ ]f) ⇒ (B [ σ ]f)
|
||
(∀∀ A) [ σ ]f = ∀∀ (A [ lift σ ]f)
|
||
|
||
-- We now can define identity on term substitutions
|
||
idₜ : Subt Γₜ Γₜ
|
||
idₜ {◇t} = εₜ
|
||
idₜ {Γₜ ▹t⁰} = lift idₜ
|
||
|
||
_∘ₜ_ : Subt Δₜ Γₜ → Subt Ξₜ Δₜ → Subt Ξₜ Γₜ
|
||
εₜ ∘ₜ β = εₜ
|
||
wk▹t α x ∘ₜ β = wk▹t (α ∘ₜ β) (x [ β ]t)
|
||
|
||
-- We have the access functions from the algebra, in restricted versions
|
||
πₜ¹ : Subt Δₜ (Γₜ ▹t⁰) → Subt Δₜ Γₜ
|
||
πₜ¹ (wk▹t σₜ t) = σₜ
|
||
πₜ² : Subt Δₜ (Γₜ ▹t⁰) → Tm Δₜ
|
||
πₜ² (wk▹t σₜ t) = t
|
||
_,ₜ_ : Subt Δₜ Γₜ → Tm Δₜ → Subt Δₜ (Γₜ ▹t⁰)
|
||
σₜ ,ₜ t = wk▹t σₜ t
|
||
|
||
-- And their equalities (the fact that there are reciprocical)
|
||
πₜ²∘,ₜ : {σₜ : Subt Δₜ Γₜ} → {t : Tm Δₜ} → πₜ² (σₜ ,ₜ t) ≡ t
|
||
πₜ²∘,ₜ = refl
|
||
πₜ¹∘,ₜ : {σₜ : Subt Δₜ Γₜ} → {t : Tm Δₜ} → πₜ¹ (σₜ ,ₜ t) ≡ σₜ
|
||
πₜ¹∘,ₜ = refl
|
||
,ₜ∘πₜ : {σₜ : Subt Δₜ (Γₜ ▹t⁰)} → (πₜ¹ σₜ) ,ₜ (πₜ² σₜ) ≡ σₜ
|
||
,ₜ∘πₜ {σₜ = wk▹t σₜ t} = refl
|
||
|
||
-- We can also prove the substitution equalities
|
||
lem1 : lift (idₜ {Γₜ}) ≡ wk▹t {!!} {!!}
|
||
[]t-id : {t : Tm Γₜ} → t [ idₜ {Γₜ} ]t ≡ t
|
||
[]tz-id : {tz : Array (Tm Γₜ) n} → tz [ idₜ {Γₜ} ]tz ≡ tz
|
||
[]t-id {◇t ▹t⁰} {var tvzero} = refl
|
||
[]t-id {(Γₜ ▹t⁰) ▹t⁰} {var tv} = {!!}
|
||
[]t-id {Γₜ} {fun f tz} = substP (λ tz' → fun f tz' ≡ fun f tz) (≡sym []tz-id) refl
|
||
[]tz-id {tz = zero} = refl
|
||
[]tz-id {tz = next x tz} = substP (λ tz' → (next (x [ idₜ ]t) tz') ≡ next x tz) (≡sym []tz-id) (substP (λ x' → next x' tz ≡ next x tz) (≡sym []t-id) refl)
|
||
[]t-∘ : {α : Subt Ξₜ Δₜ} → {β : Subt Δₜ Γₜ} → {t : Tm Γₜ} → t [ β ∘ₜ α ]t ≡ (t [ β ]t) [ α ]t
|
||
[]t-∘ {α = α} {β = β} {t = t} = {!!}
|
||
fun[] : {σ : Subt Δₜ Γₜ} → {f : F n} → {tz : Array (Tm Γₜ) n} → (fun f tz) [ σ ]t ≡ fun f (map (λ t → t [ σ ]t) tz)
|
||
[]f-id : {F : For Γₜ} → F [ idₜ {Γₜ} ]f ≡ F
|
||
[]f-∘ : {α : Subt Ξₜ Δₜ} → {β : Subt Δₜ Γₜ} → {F : For Γₜ} → F [ β ∘ₜ α ]f ≡ (F [ β ]f) [ α ]f
|
||
rel[] : {σ : Subt Δₜ Γₜ} → {r : R n} → {tz : Array (Tm Γₜ) n} → (rel r tz) [ σ ]f ≡ rel r (map (λ t → t [ σ ]t) tz)
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
data Conp : Cont → Set₁ -- pu tit in Prop
|
||
variable
|
||
Γₚ : Conp Γₜ
|
||
Δₚ : Conp Δₜ
|
||
Ξₚ : Conp Ξₜ
|
||
|
||
data Conp where
|
||
◇p : Conp Γₜ
|
||
_▹p⁰_ : Conp Γₜ → For Γₜ → Conp Γₜ
|
||
record Con : Set₁ where
|
||
constructor con
|
||
field
|
||
t : Cont
|
||
p : Conp t
|
||
|
||
◇ : Con
|
||
◇ = con ◇t ◇p
|
||
|
||
|
||
_▹p_ : (Γ : Con) → For (Con.t Γ) → Con
|
||
Γ ▹p A = con (Con.t Γ) (Con.p Γ ▹p⁰ A)
|
||
|
||
variable
|
||
Γ Δ Ξ : Con
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
-- We can add term, that will not be used in the formulæ already present
|
||
-- (that's why we use llift)
|
||
_▹tp : Conp Γₜ → Conp (Γₜ ▹t⁰)
|
||
◇p ▹tp = ◇p
|
||
(Γₚ ▹p⁰ A) ▹tp = (Γₚ ▹tp) ▹p⁰ (A [ llift idₜ ]f)
|
||
|
||
_▹t : Con → Con
|
||
Γ ▹t = con ((Con.t Γ) ▹t⁰) (Con.p Γ ▹tp)
|
||
|
||
data PfVar : (Γ : Con) → For (Con.t Γ) → Set₁ where
|
||
pvzero : {A : For (Con.t Γ)} → PfVar (Γ ▹p A) A
|
||
pvnext : {A B : For (Con.t Γ)} → PfVar Γ A → PfVar (Γ ▹p B) A
|
||
|
||
data Pf : (Γ : Con) → For (Con.t Γ) → Prop₁ where
|
||
var : {A : For (Con.t Γ)} → PfVar Γ A → Pf Γ A
|
||
app : {A B : For (Con.t Γ)} → Pf Γ (A ⇒ B) → Pf Γ A → Pf Γ B
|
||
lam : {A B : For (Con.t Γ)} → Pf (Γ ▹p A) B → Pf Γ (A ⇒ B)
|
||
|
||
--p∀∀e : {A : For Γ} → Pf Γ (∀∀ A) → Pf Γ (A [ t , id ])
|
||
--p∀∀i : {A : For (Γ ▹t)} → Pf (Γ [?]) A → Pf Γ (∀∀ A)
|
||
data Sub : Con → Con → Set₁
|
||
subt : Sub Δ Γ → Subt (Con.t Δ) (Con.t Γ)
|
||
data Sub where
|
||
εₚ : Subt (Con.t Δ) Γₜ → Sub Δ (con Γₜ ◇p) -- Γₜ → Δₜ ≡≡> (Γₜ,◇p) → (Δₜ,Δₚ)
|
||
-- If i tell you by what you should replace a missing proof of A, then you can
|
||
-- prove anything that uses a proof of A
|
||
wk▹p : {A : For (Con.t Γ)} → (σ : Sub Δ Γ) → Pf Δ (A [ subt σ ]f) → Sub Δ (Γ ▹p A)
|
||
subt (εₚ σₜ) = σₜ
|
||
subt (wk▹p σ pf) = subt σ
|
||
|
||
-- lifts
|
||
--liftpt : Pf Δ (A [ subt σ ]f) → Pf Δ ((A [ llift idₜ ]f) [ subt (σ ,ₜ t) ]f)
|
||
{-
|
||
-- The functions made for accessing the terms of Sub, needed for the algebra
|
||
πₜ¹ : {Γ Δ : Con} → Sub Δ (Γ ▹t) → Sub Δ Γ
|
||
πₜ¹ σ = {!!}
|
||
πₜ² : {Γ Δ : Con} → Sub Δ (Γ ▹t) → Tm (Con.t Δ)
|
||
πₜ² σ = {!!}
|
||
_,ₜ_ : {Γ Δ : Con} → Sub Δ Γ → Tm (Con.t Δ) → Sub Δ (Γ ▹t)
|
||
llift∘,ₜ : {σ : Sub Δ Γ} → {A : For (Con.t Γ)} → {t : Tm (Con.t Δ)} → (A [ llift idₜ ]f) [ subt (σ ,ₜ t) ]f ≡ A [ subt σ ]f
|
||
llift∘,ₜ {A = rel x x₁} = {!!}
|
||
llift∘,ₜ {A = A ⇒ A₁} = {!!}
|
||
llift∘,ₜ {A = ∀∀ A} = {!substrefl!}
|
||
(εₚ σₜ) ,ₜ t = εₚ (wk▹t σₜ t)
|
||
_,ₜ_ {Γ = ΓpA} {Δ = Δ} (wk▹p σ pf) t = wk▹p (σ ,ₜ t) (substP (λ a → Pf Δ a) llift∘,ₜ {!pf!})
|
||
πₚ¹ : {A : Con.t Γ} → Sub Δ (Γ ▹p A) → Sub Δ Γ
|
||
πₚ¹ Γₚ (wk▹p Γₚ' σ pf) = σ
|
||
πₚ² : {A : Con.t Γ} → (σ : Sub Δ (Γ ▹p A)) → Pf Δ (A [ subt (πₚ¹ (Con.p Γ) σ) ]f)
|
||
πₚ² Γₚ (wk▹p Γₚ' σ pf) = pf
|
||
_,ₚ_ : {A : Con.t Γ} → (σ : Sub Δ Γ) → Pf Δ (A [ subt σ ]f) → Sub Δ (Γ ▹p A)
|
||
_,ₚ_ = wk▹p
|
||
-}
|
||
|
||
|
||
{-
|
||
-- We subst on proofs
|
||
_,ₚ_ : {F : For (Con.t Γ)} → (σ : Sub Δ Γ) → Pf Δ (F [ subt σ ]f) → Sub Δ (Γ ▹p F)
|
||
_,ₚ_ {Γ} σ pf = wk▹p (Con.p Γ) σ pf
|
||
sub▹p : (σ : Sub (con Δₜ Δₚ) (con Γₜ Γₚ)) → Sub (con Δₜ (Δₚ ▹p⁰ (A [ subt σ ]f))) (con Γₜ (Γₚ ▹p⁰ A))
|
||
p[] : Pf Γ A → (σ : Sub Δ Γ) → Pf Δ (A [ subt σ ]f)
|
||
sub▹p Γₚ (εₚ σₜ) = wk▹p Γₚ (εₚ σₜ) (var pvzero)
|
||
sub▹p Γₚ (wk▹p p σ pf) = {!!}
|
||
test : (σ : Sub Δ Γ) → Sub (Δ ▹p (A [ subt σ ]f)) (Γ ▹p A)
|
||
p[] Γₚ (var pvzero) (wk▹p p σ pf) = pf
|
||
p[] Γₚ (var (pvnext pv)) (wk▹p p σ pf) = p[] Γₚ (var pv) σ
|
||
p[] Γₚ (app pf pf') σ = app (p[] Γₚ pf σ) (p[] Γₚ pf' σ)
|
||
p[] Γₚ (lam pf) σ = lam (p[] {!\!} {!!} (sub▹p {!!} {!σ!}))
|
||
-}
|
||
|
||
{-
|
||
idₚ : Subp Γₚ Γₚ
|
||
idₚ {Γₚ = ◇p} = εₚ
|
||
idₚ {Γₚ = Γₚ ▹p⁰ A} = wk▹p Γₚ (liftₚ Γₚ idₚ) (var pvzero)
|
||
|
||
ε : Sub Γ ◇
|
||
ε = sub εₜ εₚ
|
||
|
||
id : Sub Γ Γ
|
||
id = sub idₜ idₚ
|
||
|
||
_∘ₜ_ : Subt Δₜ Ξₜ → Subt Γₜ Δₜ → Subt Γₜ Ξₜ
|
||
εₜ ∘ₜ εₜ = εₜ
|
||
εₜ ∘ₜ wk▹t β x = εₜ
|
||
(wk▹t α t) ∘ₜ β = wk▹t (α ∘ₜ β) (t [ β ]t)
|
||
|
||
_∘ₚ_ : Subp Δₚ Ξₚ → Subp Γₚ Δₚ → Subp Γₚ Ξₚ
|
||
εₚ ∘ₚ βₚ = εₚ
|
||
wk▹p p αₚ x ∘ₚ βₚ = {!wk▹p ? ? ?!}
|
||
|
||
_∘_ : Sub Δ Ξ → Sub Γ Δ → Sub Γ Ξ
|
||
sub αₜ αₚ ∘ (sub βₜ βₚ) = sub (αₜ ∘ₜ βₜ) {!!}
|
||
-}
|
||
|
||
imod : FFOL {lsuc lzero} {lsuc lzero} {lsuc lzero} {lsuc lzero} F R
|
||
imod = record
|
||
{ Con = Con
|
||
; Sub = Sub
|
||
; _∘_ = {!!}
|
||
; id = {!!}
|
||
; ◇ = ◇
|
||
; ε = {!!}
|
||
; Tm = λ Γ → Tm (Con.t Γ)
|
||
; _[_]t = λ t σ → t [ subt σ ]t
|
||
; []t-id = {!!}
|
||
; []t-∘ = {!!}
|
||
; fun = fun
|
||
; fun[] = {!!}
|
||
; _▹ₜ = _▹t
|
||
; πₜ¹ = {!!}
|
||
; πₜ² = {!!}
|
||
; _,ₜ_ = {!!}
|
||
; πₜ²∘,ₜ = {!!}
|
||
; πₜ¹∘,ₜ = {!!}
|
||
; ,ₜ∘πₜ = {!!}
|
||
; For = λ Γ → For (Con.t Γ)
|
||
; _[_]f = λ A σ → A [ subt σ ]f
|
||
; []f-id = {!!}
|
||
; []f-∘ = {!!}
|
||
; rel = rel
|
||
; rel[] = {!!}
|
||
; _⊢_ = λ Γ A → Pf Γ A
|
||
; _▹ₚ_ = _▹p_
|
||
; πₚ¹ = {!!}
|
||
; πₚ² = {!!}
|
||
; _,ₚ_ = {!!}
|
||
; ,ₚ∘πₚ = {!!}
|
||
; πₚ¹∘,ₚ = {!!}
|
||
; _⇒_ = _⇒_
|
||
; []f-⇒ = {!!}
|
||
; ∀∀ = ∀∀
|
||
; []f-∀∀ = {!!}
|
||
; lam = {!!}
|
||
; app = app
|
||
; ∀i = {!!}
|
||
; ∀e = {!!}
|
||
}
|
||
|